Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
I agree that the subject matter is interesting but this is getting off-topic. Let's try and keep focused on European Renaissance MA, which is the subject matter of this forum.Looked interesting if nothing else. I was curious about middle eastern martial arts. Google searches of this generally only produced Asian Martial arts dojos in middle eastern countries. This one is obviously of Indian/hindi origin and not Arab. The sword being so important to Arabic culture I had wondered to what extent Arab culture retained it's old martial skills, or if they became obscure as in Europe?
Wouldn't Arabic (and by extension, Persian and Indian) marital arts be of relevance to WMA in terms of trying to reconstruct the history and context of the Western Martial Tradition, if only because of the close interraction with WMA warriors? I mean, from the Crusades to the Reconquista to the Ottomans, you certainly had a lot of close interraction. Saracen mercenaries were used not just in spain, but in Italy and France... "Damascus" steel came from India to the Middle East and through Toledo in Spain to several other important sword manufacturing centers (such as Barcelona in Catalonia). IIRC The bodyguard of the Doge of Venice, the famous Schiavoni, namesake of which the famous Schiavona sword favored by so many modern collectors, were Muslim mercenaries from Albania. We know from historical evidence that Jewish wrestling apparently had a major influence on Ringen... I would personally be interested to know if there were any other traditions brought over to Christian Europe from other neighboring cultures.
I agree that the subject matter is interesting but this is getting off-topic. Let's try and keep focused on European Renaissance MA, which is the subject matter of this forum.
Thanx!
Read your last sentence above and you'll see the problem. It becomes a matter of is it directly relevant, or is it an interesting trip down a side road that is not. We are a Forum dedicated to the martial arts of European cultures, not to the contemporary martial arts of the East. Relevant content is a fine line to walk in a thread of this type...Now if we were discussing the comparative tactics and techniques used by these two cultures when engaged with one-another in battle, that would be on topic in my opinion.
I agree that the subject matter is interesting but this is getting off-topic. Let's try and keep focused on European Renaissance MA, which is the subject matter of this forum.
Thanx!
... but the issue of actual historical Middle Eastern martial arts at any rate does seem somewhat signfiicant to WMA.
Just my $.02 anyway
J
Well that kind of thing always makes for an interesting discussion too, but how and precisely where you separate individual fighting technique from combat tactics is a fine line, especially so the further back you go into history where individual prowess could matter as much or more than things like tactical oprganization or even logistics.Now if we were discussing the comparative tactics and techniques used by these two cultures when engaged with one-another in battle, that would be on topic in my opinion.
Well that kind of thing always makes for an interesting discussion too, but how and precisely where you separate individual fighting technique from combat tactics is a fine line, especially so the further back you go into history where individual prowess could matter as much or more than things like tactical oprganization or even logistics.Now if we were discussing the comparative tactics and techniques used by these two cultures when engaged with one-another in battle, that would be on topic in my opinion.
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||