Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
I believe if you read the rest of the thread you'll see a plate from Talhoffer showing a dagger throw. I think we owe it to ourselves to discuss issues like this if only to debunk misconceptions. I can appreciate a healthy dose of empirical skepticism, but I don't think an out and out dismissive attitude helps us much.There are no old sources showing throwing daggers.
Okay, Brian. You got me. Goes to show how important the text is to interpreting the picture. Personally, I am very cautious about interpreting pictures without reference to the text. It is too easy to get it wrong otherwise. So we have one example of throwing the dagger.Hi Jay,
just so you know, the first Talhoffer plate shown earlier for the Thott is a throw with a knife.
A quick translation reads:
Daz blenden ab dem huopt Darby der wurff [in leib]
Here to blind with the hat to present (or offer) the throw to the body.
However, I agree with you that throwing your knife is a bad idea in a fight, unless you have a backup knife.
The second Talhoffer picture says nothing about throwing something.
all the best.
Brian Hunt
GFS
Jeremy, I saw that one plate, but I am very reluctant to interpret it without the translation. I have made mistakes myself in interpreting the pictures alone without reference to the text only to discover my error later when the text was available, and I have seen others make the same mistake. Brian, however, has provided a translation for the first plate that seems to confirm that the author intends the picture to depict a throw of the dagger. So I am wrong.I believe if you read the rest of the thread you'll see a plate from Talhoffer showing a dagger throw. I think we owe it to ourselves to discuss issues like this if only to debunk misconceptions. I can appreciate a healthy dose of empirical skepticism, but I don't think an out and out dismissive attitude helps us much.There are no old sources showing throwing daggers.
Hi AllenOn the Scottish Dirk...
"It was also used in much the same manner as a lance: for I have been informed of those people were dexterous marksmen with it; for they would throw at a considerable distance, and hit the object with a certainty."
I don't really know what to make of that Talhoffer plate. Brian's translation seems to indicate that the dagger must in fact have been thrown, which means I was wrong to suppose the old sources did not include such a thing. Maybe it shows the best case scenario, where you get impact with the point, but perhaps the lesson is: here are ways to distract your opponent so you can close and wrestle. Hard to say, it may be just another trick for the toolbox.Jay,
I agree with you.
But...
What's going on in the Talhoffer Plate? Do you think the threw the hat, stabbed the guy, then backed off, leaving the knife? Certainly possible. Insetad of calling to shut the thread down let's get educated.
You said that there are no records in coroner's reports of knife throw injuries, etc. That's good--we can learn from it instead of just hearing, "That's crap, you guys are basically just arguing ninjas vs. pirates here."
I agree that throwing a knife in combat is a fantasy. But let's (a) explain that Talhoffer plate and then (b) learn *why* it's a fantasy.
Jake
Interesting, thanks for the info. I wonder what he means by "a considerable distance" though. It would seem unlikely that anyone could reliably hit a moving target at a range further than 10 or 15 feet. This is all just speculation, though. It seems as if some of you have experience with throwing knives or daggers, I'd be interested to hear your interpretation of the range issue.
On the Scottish Dirk...
"It was also used in much the same manner as a lance: for I have been informed of those people were dexterous marksmen with it; for they would throw at a considerable distance, and hit the object with a certainty."
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot] and 9 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||