Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
Just out of curiosity, does the handle length affect that sword in any way? it seems that a 9" grip including the pommel seems rather short. Does anyone know of any swords with a 10 inch grip that are around 200$, preferably under.I bought the Windlass 15th Century long sword (the one with the hex pommel, thumb guards, and the wire wrap on the lower half of the hilt) from Kult of Athena. I asked about Windlass before I purchased the sword and the general reply was a Windlass can be a good low end sword, but is hit or miss. I paid around $180 I think and I have been pleased with its performance and look.
I showed it to Jake N. and to John C. and both handled it and agreed it was pretty well made (for a Windlass), not having the wobbly blade and flimsy cross they were expecting. John said he wouldn't have payed that much for it and I did have to tighten the pommel (which just screws on).
As my first sword, I'm pleased. I have sharpened the last foot or so and use it for test cutting. I haven't used it on anything besides bottles and cardboard, but I am pleased with my singular experience with a Windlass and KoA.
He has looked at it, but he is looking for something longer (he is around 6' in height). However, I am certainly considering the hand and a half, but the Windlass seems to a) be longer, b) be cheaper and c) have siderings. However, Hanwei might be slightly better quality so it might be worth it. Hanwei also seems to make a model known as the "Bastard Sword" which is pretty long. However, I was told earlier that it was quite flexible and not very good.Not to beat a dead horse, but if he'd like to try the Cold Steel Hand-And-A-Half sword, it's a bit more at $225, and is probably as good quality as you'll find in that price range. A bit more than your Windlass one, though.
Jason
Haha, Nice. In that case I will definately consider Windlass for their adaptability, a construction project does sound like fun. However, I don't actually have much of a problem with buying from the Chinese, after all I did live there for 8 years. I personally think it isn't much of a problem to help a Chinese manufacturer by buying from them, after all, from my own personal experience I can definitely say that they do need the cash. And if they happen to make better quality and cheaper products, then why shouldn't I buy from them? Isn't that the concept of a free market?No -- there is no reason to think that Hanwei, or whatever Paul Chen decides to rename his company in the next 3 to 4 years, is going to be any better. He has made his stuff floppy to please the SCA dudes. He has an undeservedly high reputation. Chen could not even make a proper Huscarl axe -- way too heavy and thick, with visible hardening cracks. He ought to stick to making dao and jian, where presumably his own pride of culture leads him to some standard of quality. I have yet to find anyone who has bought one of his European style swords who decided the quality was so superb that they became repeat customers. At least with Windlass, you can buy the thing and treat it like a "kit-sword" -- you can rebuild the grip and customise the thing, and make it better, in many cases. How do I know that -- because I have rebuilt like 4 different Windlass swords & 1 dagger. But Hanwei items should go straight to the scrap-yard as soon as you realise the rip-off. Lastly, keep in mind that every item you buy from communist China is one more nail in the economic coffin of the USA, Europe, Canada, New Zealand and Australia.
Thus sending your money to India. I wonder where their customer support is located.(However, in this case their products are neither cheaper nor better, so I am throwing my lot in with Windlass).
What's wrong with India? It's not like they don't need a little extra cash.Thus sending your money to India. I wonder where their customer support is located.(However, in this case their products are neither cheaper nor better, so I am throwing my lot in with Windlass).
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 135 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||