Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
Good idea--better one that lasts a long time than a zillion that break every swing. Adds to the sentimental value as well.Caleb,
If price is an issue, your best bet is to wait. Save up the money to get a good one. Under $100 you are not going to really find anything that is worth salt. However, if you save $50 a month you can get a decent sword that will last more than a lifetime. Even a lot of wasters (if you buy them) are over $100. My advice: save up and get the good ones.
Yes, the SG guys like & use those shinai. As much as I respect a lot of what SG does, the shinai buffeting is not part of it. Shinai are worthless to the craft of European Renaissance fencing -- no matter what modifications you make to them. (If shinai are so great, how come they do not even replicate katanas accurately, with a real kenjitsuka preferring bokken etc. instead -- think about it.) I would strongly recommend staying away from shinai. Get yourself a wooden waster, or perhaps a plastic waster -- either material is fine, although some fencers have preference. Wasters much more accurately replicate Western swords, are tougher, have better weight, true edge-discernment, etc.Ah yeah, i forgot to add. About wasters...
I see that Schola Gladiatora and a lot of other WMA groups use Shinais (with adjustments?) as wasters. I've taken kendo for about a year, but I always had the impression that the shinais were lighter and balanced differently than the typical longsword. Did they have some modifications of the shinais to weigh/balance them properly, or did they just add longsword Crossguards?
That is one point I find particularly amusing. The blade is better at replicating European swords, since it's straight (well, some European swords were curved as well, but you get my point)(If shinai are so great, how come they do not even replicate katanas accurately
I am going to disagree here. I have sparred with Shenai, I have sparred with wasters, and the shenai hurt WAY more. People tend to think that because of the four panel construction of the shenai that it will dispurse the energy more, but the fact is: then they swing harder!
Still, for full contact sparring, a shinai is better because of the simple fact that a waster will hurt you, if you use full power.
There is no good reason for using a shinai, for anything other than full contact sparring.
So if it hurts more, because people use more force?but the fact is: then they swing harder!
Agreed.All that being said, If that is all you have, use it! But try and get the real thing as soon as possible. You will see immediate changes.
Hi Jeff! Im no Schola guy, but I am one who moved due to university studies and so went from sparring with wood and padded wasters in ARMA to spar with shinai in GHFS, so my opinion might be worth something to you
Incidentally: Any SG guys are welcome to tell us here what benefit they derive from shinai usage. But again, I insist they are unrealistic at best, and indeed, lead to bad habits of fencing. Moreover, I think that events like Dijon would be better served if their "longsword" tournaments used plastic wasters instead of shinai. Think about it guys.
I can recommend the aluminum blunts at www.SwordCrafts.com . I have one of my own and the school I attend has 4 of them. One other student has bought his own as well. They stand up to full contact extremely well. Unlike our older aluminum blades, the SwordCrafts blade is rounded. This avoids the nicks and burs that develop on the squared-off blades.Yet I want to get a decent, authentic blunt longsword for practice, and I'm wondering if anyone has any recommendations of any so-so authentic (but CHEAP) longswords I can get my hands on.
Well I haven't gone there too many times, due to various reasons, and, again due to various reasons, haven't been there for maybe half a year (damn! I have to fix that!), so for all I know, they might have changed the equipment they use.Alan, out of curiosity, which group do you practice with?.
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||