Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
We absolutely need pics of that Aaron! I made a pair of the fiberglass rod rapiers using poles of different length in a stagger arrangement and the DFW group loves them. From the hilt to the first third of the blade there are three rods, the next third there are two rods, and the last third to the tip there is just the one rod. But I struggled with the hilt. What I ended up with is functional but very ugly. I've been thinking about making some more but didn't want to get started until I've got a better option for the hilt.We had one of our guys make a very nice hilt out of metal tubing, it adds weight and it allows us to have complex guards and designs on it as well.
I'll try and get pics up sooner or later-good luck!- AP
Well, that's not true. You can get rapiers that are plenty stiff, but having them that stiff just isn't that critical for historical techniques.From what I understand, no reproduction rapier out there right now COMES CLOSE to the stiffness that actual rapiers possessed. The reproductions just don't simulate actual rapier blades enough to accurately learn historical fencing with a rapier.
You can get great steel simulators. Why use fiberglass when there are excellent simulators available (unless it's a matter of cost)?So for right now, the best simulators for a historical rapiers are either homemade wooden or fiberglass wasters. The pair I made cost me about $40 in parts for the two of them. Spend less and build your own.
Hmmm...I think that 5 years ago, Darkwood was using Del Tin blades, and some of those weren't so good compared to what they were later. However, if you're ever at an event with people who have newer Darkwood or A&A Rapiers, definitely check them out (i.e. handle them).I should offer the caveat that the Darkwoods I handled were over five years ago, so it is possible that they are making stiffer blades now than they did in the past, and I have not handled any A&A pieces, so I can't say anything about their quality. Certainly most steel simulators I've seen were noodly to the point of being almost useless, vastly inferior to the originals in feel and handling. Wooden simulators have performed better for me and others I have trained with, though currently I use fiberglass which is passable but hardly perfect (but easier to make and better than nothing). I think our differences of experience would be impossible to hash out on a forum like this without firsthand evidence to produce, so I'll agree to leave it as a civil disagreement.
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 210 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||