Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
Stacy, Joshua and Sal have answered this question perfectly. Fully agree with Sal that although getting stabbed in the face (with control, of course, and while wearing face protection) is not fun, it does wake you up. Also, as Sal stated, you are doing yourself and, more importantly, your partner an extreme disservice if you negate this historically accurate and fundamental part of sparring.The other thing to be aware of if thrusting to a fencing mask is that if you hit it hard enough it pushes the bottom of the mask into the larynx. This is pretty uncomfortable, but no permanent damage. So you can either accept the risk, or get one of the Revival padded gorgets for like $16.
I stab people in the face. Even given the risks it is extremely safe, and gets people's attention. I also feel that you're hurting yourself by disallowing thrusts to the face. Especially if you're studying Liect b/c so much of his techniques revolve around stabbing people in the face.
As a matter of fact. I feel that anytime you remove a technique you're doing yourself and your partner a disservice.
On that note, was it Meyer that said something about thrusting being used in the "ancient art" but not in his time? Is there any reason for that change?
I stab people in the face. Even given the risks it is extremely safe, and gets people's attention. I also feel that you're hurting yourself by disallowing thrusts to the face. Especially if you're studying Liect b/c so much of his techniques revolve around stabbing people in the face.
Well, Meyer's work was a bit school fighting oriented. He taught and fought in a guild, and as far as I know, never saw action on the battle field. He probably made the concession to not allow thrusts because he thought it was a safer way to train. Now, I don't agree with that personally, but I understand it. You also have to keep in mind that a lot of Meyer techniques ignore the possibility of a thrust at all.On that note, was it Meyer that said something about thrusting being used in the "ancient art" but not in his time? Is there any reason for that change?
Ehhh. Flexing more at the tip is better than flexing badly throughout the length of the blade. Albion doesn't get it right every time, and they are not above occasionallygiving less serious HEMA customers what they want instead of upholding high historical standards. And not all modern inventions are bad. We use fencing masks...My concern from that video is when he says the newer model of Hanwei has the "...same level of flex, but only within the last several inches of the blade, just as it's done in MODERN FENCING SWORDS" [emphasis mine]. This should not be considered a quality unless it matches historical accuracy.
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot] and 141 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||