Research and Discussion Forums

Skip to content

Looks like a bad study.

For Historical European Fighting Arts, Weaponry, & Armor

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford

Post Reply
User avatar
Robert Harden
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 5:50 pm

Looks like a bad study.

Postby Robert Harden » Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:36 pm

Does this study look fishy to anyone?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 194352.htm
Top
Kevin Reicks
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:06 pm

Re: Looks like a bad study.

Postby Kevin Reicks » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:47 am

Does this study look fishy to anyone?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 194352.htm
Yes, this article has been around a while and I don't know how much the reporter is screwing up the article or the researchers were too ignorant of what they were studying. Armor did not weigh that much and while it could get hot and restricted movement slightly, it wasn't overly so and still a good thing to have.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Research and Training Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 276 guests

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
 

 

 
 
Note: ARMA™ - The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and the ARMA logo are federally registered trademarks, copyright 2001. All rights reserved. No use of the ARMA name or emblem is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of the authors is strictly prohibited. HACA and The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright 1999 by John Clements. All rights reserved. Contents of this site 1999 by ARMA.