http://www.thearma.org/Videos/Armored_Free-Play.htm

Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
That makes perfect sense to me.I can't remember the bsource, but some italian guy advised that, if you met a fully armoured man on the bttlefield, there should be atleast 4 of you ganging up on him to be sure to dispose him.
When you're fully armed, gauntlets are not an issue as far as the other guy's safety (as evidenced by the abundance of knee strikes, elbow and forearm strikes delivered in the video), only your own, really.One question: Why do you fellas not wear any hand protection? I know that in unarmored free play there's a safety hazard with wearing plated gauntlets, but it seems like that hazard is greatly reduced since you're wearing full harness.
It doesn't seem to be a problem in my experience. There are certainly mean things you can do to the other guy's hands with your armour if you get ahold of them, or with certain other techniques, but there doesn't seem to be any incidental discomforts.Any particular reason for not wearing gauntlets? Maybe I'm just a sissy, but all that steel seems like it might pinch and abrade the digits more than I'm used to.
Well, it's not supposed to, and it's a fault not found in antique armour. The pieces that came off were all secured by spring pin latches that turned out to be unsuited for such hard use (but prior to that hadn't really been used enough for us to find out).One question though: Do armor pieces really fall off so easily like that? I had the impression that each piece in a suit was strapped pretty sturdily.
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot] and 108 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||