Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
"Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruninghooks into spears:let the weak say, I am strong" Joel 3:10 because of the most high God of course
I don't understand what you would mean by "the purest form of fighting". If you choose to do unarmed, ofcourse that is yours to make, but I can guaranty you that if you start with serious weapons training you will learn self-defense faster and better intune. I know this from my own experience and the experiences of others. You will learn grappling with weapons.Yes, I know that is unarmed fighting and i am conscious of that, but ithinkthat unarmed fighting is the purest form of fighting so I want to begin it with unarmed fighting first then weapon based and please I really want to know what is the rule because I doesnt read to much of it (I am doing it at school)
Spartans used Pankration for unarmed combat and they include biting and gouging for it unlike other Greek city states(definitely it can be used as powerful fighting arts)
Kampfringen from what I know is not a sport they used it in armored combat and unarmored combat however Ringkunst is sport. (like Jujutsu to Judo)
In the Modern Age, many real martial art in the Western world was reduced to a sport which is bad because the West seem to have no useful MA. However person like Johannes Josephsson and Ad Santel can defeat Japanese martial artist.
This is my first forum in this website so I don't know what to do?
And I know that many Eastern Martial Arts have like degraded to theatrical form and someone even said that only 20 or 10 of all chinese martial arts is real combat MA but I will write after someone reply!
"Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruninghooks into spears:let the weak say, I am strong" Joel 3:10 because of the most high God of course
If you think Silat is "dirtier" than RMA then you obviously never looked closely at RMA. I've already had this discussion, and don't really feel like repeating it, but you can search the forum for the topic.
By the way have you the Silat of Indonesia , most Western guy I see in forum like silat more than Kampfringen, because it include very dirty fighting typical of southeast asian MA, stomping (very basic), clawing(childish things), attacking genitals(dirty).
I shold have clarified myself better. I was only refering to these:Bartitsu, Defendu, and Krav Maga is definitely not a sport.
Kampfringen is a Martial Art. It was the only Martial Art in the lists of things not influenced by the EMA.Kampfringen not a sport, in the weapons MA section
Ancient Age: Greek and Roman swordsmanship, spear fighting, etc, barbarian weapns fighting techniques.
Middle Age: longsword fencing, polearms, shields, spears, axes and maces.
Modern Age: rapier fencing, bayonet fighting, knife fighitng staff fighting, walking stick fighting, and many more.
Compared to MA without weapons, theMA with weapons is more complex and often overlap several in periods, example spear fighting exist in Ancient Age, Middle Age, and Modern Age (maybe in bayonet fencing).
True, point well taken. But as far as Fencing theory goes, the rapier and the smallsword are used differently.Ah yes, I know that rapier is Renaissance weapon, but in my school we state that ModernAge is from 1500 to today so I state that the RMA is also modern MA,
is Pankration and Pammachon influenced by EMA?
Nopeor Bare knuckle boxing?
or Cornish/Lancashire/Scottish/Irish folk wrestling?
..And...Where are you going with this?I see several manual where the musket with bayonet is hold with the right hand in front of the left hand (from pike fighting techniques) the manual is from early to mid 18th century.
I wouldn't say Rapier fencing is linear. Boxing is a sport that has been around much longer than the smallsword, rapier or bayonet. Bayonet fencing is definitly influenced by the smallsword. I would say that the smallsword contributed to the lack of unarmed fighting as it was relagated to only "gentlemanly fighting" over the years leaving the all in fighting out.I hypothesize that rapier fencing and especially smallsword fencing influenced pure modern Europen unarmed combat to much, causing
boxing and bayonet fighting to be too linear, but I will discuss it on other forum.
That's odd. European pike manuals from the 16th-18th centuries (at least the ones I've read) generally show the soldier holding the pike with the left hand forward--and the left leg is the forward leg, too, so they end up facing the same way as the Shot or later soldiers with muskets/rifles and bayonets. This similarity is on such general terms that it can't really be used to draw a meaningful link between Renaissance pike fighting and later bayonet fighting. (For instance, I've never, ever seen bayonet postures based on the fundamental pike-fighting postures of "Charge Pike" or "Charge for Horse.")I see several manual where the musket with bayonet is hold with the right hand in front of the left hand (from pike fighting techniques) the manual is from early to mid 18th century.
Joshua - to be honest, I have no idea what you are asking. It may be a language barrier.Hello! I have just register in this arma website, I want to know , is WMA have any concept not known is EMA? I think for one continent Europe have not really much MA.
For EXample:
Ancient Age: Pankration, Greek Boxing and wrestling, folk wrestling
Medieval Age: Kampfringen,various folk wrestling.
Modern Age Bare Knuckle and Modern Boxing, Wrestling, various folk wrestling.
Influenced by EMA: Savate, Bartitsu, Defendu, Krav Maga
this is few compared to just the Chinese which have like hundreds of striking styles and hundreds of Chin Na school.
I am Chinese, just want to know what arma can offer.
I like western martial arts! however the eastern today is more popular however there is several chinese styles that have not yet known in public.
Return to “Unarmed Skills Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 76 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||