Moderators: Webmaster, Stacy Clifford
I actually think this is a great thing for the art in general. I don't know how the balance will be, but the ability to purchase an entry-level plastic waster is a huge plus. How many people haven't begun serious study of HEMA because they were turned off by a $100 + price tag on the most basic piece of equipment you need--and on top of that, they're told that that one, if it's wood, will break in a year or so anyway?So Cold Steel is scheduled to come out with a set of plastic wasters for European swords sometime this month. I doubt they've worked with anybody competent anywhere in designing it.
To be honest it looks like a black fence post. There seems to be no sign of tapering for balance and the fuller is almost certainly just for show. They would have done better replicating a Type XVa design (such as this: http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/alb ... ry-xva.htm), at least that would have had the taper built in. Considering my exposure to their sword making, which seems to stress durability, rather than dynamic performance, or historical accuracy, I don't have high expectations for it.
There is one attractive thing about these that may persuade me to try one. It is half the price of the good wasters on the market, and being plastic probably won't ever break. It might be worth a shot.
Their training dagger on the other hand has much more appeal, as dagger simulators need much less in the performance department to work well.
Have a look: http://www.coldsteel.com/bokkens.html and tell me what you think.
They weren't really "cutting" with the boken. They were demonstrating how it stands up to destructive testing. A wooden waster should "cut" a watermelon or cardboard in the same way. In the video, they showed the edge which was just as rounded as a Hollow Earth waster (though not as blunt as an NSA waster).Anyone else watch the video on the linked page? It's got them cutting all sorts of things with their wasters. I think these things may have more of an edge than desired for contact pratice.
Adding weight to the handle won't really fix any balance problem: you'll be able to bring the CoG back but the moment of inertia will not be right, most probably too big if you just add weight to the pommel. According to my measurements you cannot realistically have something balanced accurately like a real sword if it does not taper over the blade.Also, I imagine a little work could fix balance problems (though not tapering ones) by adding a bit of weight to the handle.
That's what I thought, too. Taking a look at longsword wasters from the major manufacturers, a conservative average length is around 47.5 inches. The average length of steel training swords from major manufacturers is about 47.1 inches.Might be a tad short, but otherwise look like great entry level wasters to me.
I was just visiting the Cold Steel site and noticed that they have pushed out the date that they'll have these until 3/31/09. If it goes like some other products I've gotten there, I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't pushed out again after that. They seem to have some supply/delivery problems from time to time.[...]
Related to your discussion, I really don't see why there is not a 50$ option for a beginner long sword student. [...].
I was just visiting the Cold Steel site and noticed that they have pushed out the date that they'll have these until 3/31/09. If it goes like some other products I've gotten there, I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't pushed out again after that. They seem to have some supply/delivery problems from time to time.[...]
Related to your discussion, I really don't see why there is not a 50$ option for a beginner long sword student. [...].
Return to “Research and Training Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||